Loading match
Loading match
Triangles compare each player with the typical player at their own rank, for this one match. Select a name to see their full comparison.
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | ADR | Rating | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| team_PacijenTT-4 | ||||||||
| 12 | 15 | 3 | -3 | 65, better than 17% at Level 3 | 0.92, better than 56% at Level 3 | |||
| MJF-JDM–Steam profile of MJF-JDM (opens in a new tab) | 10 | 14 | 2 | -4 | 68 | 0.81 | ||
| PacijenTT-Level 5Steam profile of PacijenTT- (opens in a new tab) | 10 | 17 | 5 | -7 | 98, better than 97% at Level 5 | 0.66, better than 1% at Level 5 | ||
| snoppiedoggLevel 5Steam profile of snoppiedogg (opens in a new tab) | 8 | 14 | 3 | -6 | 58, better than 2% at Level 5 | 0.57, better than 1% at Level 5 | ||
| Avas215–Steam profile of Avas215 (opens in a new tab) | 2 | 17 | 1 | -15 | 24 | 0.10 | ||
| team_The_Xzeno13 | ||||||||
| 21 | 6 | 8 | +15 | 139, better than 99% at Level 4 | 2.07, better than 99% at Level 4 | |||
| 20 | 6 | 3 | +14 | 93, better than 97% at Level 3 | 1.82, better than 99% at Level 3 | |||
| Player | Util dmg | Flashed | Thrown |
|---|---|---|---|
| team_PacijenTT-4 | |||
| 60, better than 61% at Level 3 | 3, better than 57% at Level 3 | 3 | |
| MJF-JDM–Steam profile of MJF-JDM (opens in a new tab) | 145 | 6 | 7 |
| PacijenTT-Level 5Steam | |||
FACEIT's API only has match totals, so there's no round-by-round timeline or aim stats for FACEIT matches.
| 17 |
| 10 |
| 5 |
| +7 |
| 109, better than 99% at Level 2 |
| 1.48, better than 99% at Level 2 |
| 11 | 9 | 3 | +2 | 60, better than 3% at Level 4 | 1.03, better than 75% at Level 4 |
| 7 | 11 | 8 | -4 | 61 | 0.70 |
| 74, better than 64% at Level 5 |
| 0, better than 1% at Level 5 |
| 1 |
| snoppiedoggLevel 5Steam profile of snoppiedogg (opens in a new tab) | 53, better than 48% at Level 5 | 2, better than 34% at Level 5 | 3 |
|---|
| Avas215–Steam profile of Avas215 (opens in a new tab) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
|---|
| team_The_Xzeno13 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 121, better than 92% at Level 4 | 0, better than 1% at Level 4 | 0 | |
| 142, better than 96% at Level 3 | 0, better than 1% at Level 3 | 0 | |
| 109, better than 90% at Level 2 | 2, better than 46% at Level 2 | 8 | |
| 0, better than 1% at Level 4 | 3, better than 50% at Level 4 | 3 | |
| 104 | 3 | 3 | |