Loading match
Loading match
Triangles compare each player with the typical player at their own rank, for this one match. Select a name to see their full comparison.
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | ADR | Rating | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| team_KIXONE13 | ||||||||
| 20 | 10 | 4 | +10 | 114, better than 99% at Level 1 | 1.51, better than 99% at Level 1 | |||
| 20 | 14 | 1 | +6 | 102, better than 99% at Level 2 | 1.43, better than 99% at Level 2 | |||
| 14 | 11 | 6 | +3 | 85 | 1.27 | |||
| 16 | 10 | 3 | +6 | 82, better than 92% at Level 2 | 1.24, better than 99% at Level 2 | |||
| NGU-200iqLevel 1Steam profile of NGU-200iq (opens in a new tab) | 14 | 13 | 3 | +1 | 77, better than 85% at Level 1 | 1.09, better than 96% at Level 1 | ||
| team_BaBolFve6 | ||||||||
| 18 | 15 | 3 | +3 | 87, better than 96% at Level 2 | 1.42, better than 99% at Level 2 | |||
| 14 | 18 | 5 | -4 | 96, better than 99% at Level 1 | 0.96, better than 86% at Level 1 | |||
| Player | Util dmg | Flashed | Thrown |
|---|---|---|---|
| team_KIXONE13 | |||
| 0, better than 1% at Level 1 | 8, better than 89% at Level 1 | 10 | |
| 16, better than 32% at Level 2 | 6, better than 77% at Level 2 | ||
FACEIT's API only has match totals, so there's no round-by-round timeline or aim stats for FACEIT matches.
| 12 |
| 17 |
| 5 |
| -5 |
| 60, better than 17% at Level 2 |
| 0.89, better than 63% at Level 2 |
| 9 | 19 | 7 | -10 | 69, better than 65% at Level 1 | 0.46, better than 3% at Level 1 |
| 3 | 17 | 2 | -14 | 26, better than 1% at Level 1 | 0.22, better than 1% at Level 1 |
| 9 |
| 0 | 2 | 8 |
| 168, better than 97% at Level 2 | 2, better than 44% at Level 2 | 2 |
| NGU-200iqLevel 1Steam profile of NGU-200iq (opens in a new tab) | 33, better than 48% at Level 1 | 0, better than 1% at Level 1 | 5 |
|---|
| team_BaBolFve6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 73, better than 69% at Level 2 | 9, better than 92% at Level 2 | 10 | |
| 56, better than 64% at Level 1 | 14, better than 99% at Level 1 | 8 | |
| 7, better than 26% at Level 2 | 0, better than 1% at Level 2 | 0 | |
| 0, better than 1% at Level 1 | 0, better than 1% at Level 1 | 0 | |
| 32, better than 48% at Level 1 | 3, better than 55% at Level 1 | 3 | |