Loading match
Loading match
Triangles compare each player with the typical player at their own rank, for this one match. Select a name to see their full comparison.
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | ADR | Rating | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| team_MilkaSigma6 | ||||||||
| ItasqbaLevel 2Steam profile of Itasqba (opens in a new tab) | 14 | 15 | 2 | -1 | 84, better than 95% at Level 2 | 1.03, better than 90% at Level 2 | ||
| 12 | 14 | 7 | -2 | 87, better than 94% at Level 3 | 0.90, better than 40% at Level 3 | |||
| MilkaSigma–Steam profile of MilkaSigma (opens in a new tab) | 13 | 17 | 4 | -4 | 82 | 0.81 | ||
| 11 | 16 | 1 | -5 | 54, better than 11% at Level 2 | 0.67, better than 14% at Level 2 | |||
| 0-Vini-0Level 4Steam profile of 0-Vini-0 (opens in a new tab) | 10 | 16 | 5 | -6 | 53, better than 1% at Level 4 | 0.57, better than 1% at Level 4 | ||
| team_Rusla4ikk13 | ||||||||
| 21 | 13 | 3 | +8 | 99 | 1.61 | |||
| 19 | 11 | 5 | +8 | 117, better than 99% at Level 2 | 1.36, better than 99% at Level 2 | |||
| Player | Util dmg | Flashed | Thrown |
|---|---|---|---|
| team_MilkaSigma6 | |||
| ItasqbaLevel 2Steam profile of Itasqba (opens in a new tab) | 4, better than 24% at Level 2 | 4, better than 61% at Level 2 | 4 |
| 21, better than 31% at Level 3 | 0, better than 1% at Level 3 | 2 | |
FACEIT's API only has match totals, so there's no round-by-round timeline or aim stats for FACEIT matches.
| 15 |
| 13 |
| 8 |
| +2 |
| 86 |
| 1.07 |
| 13 | 12 | 6 | +1 | 72, better than 34% at Level 3 | 1.00, better than 78% at Level 3 |
| 10 | 11 | 4 | -1 | 62, better than 19% at Level 2 | 0.88, better than 59% at Level 2 |
| MilkaSigma–Steam profile of MilkaSigma (opens in a new tab) |
|---|
| 74 |
| 13 |
| 11 |
| 0, better than 1% at Level 2 | 0, better than 1% at Level 2 | 0 |
| 0-Vini-0Level 4Steam profile of 0-Vini-0 (opens in a new tab) | 0, better than 1% at Level 4 | 4, better than 56% at Level 4 | 6 |
|---|
| team_Rusla4ikk13 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 228 | 3 | 3 | |
| 75, better than 70% at Level 2 | 2, better than 44% at Level 2 | 2 | |
| 290 | 0 | 5 | |
| 72, better than 65% at Level 3 | 7, better than 85% at Level 3 | 10 | |
| 23, better than 36% at Level 2 | 0, better than 1% at Level 2 | 0 | |