Loading match
Loading match
Triangles compare each player with the typical player at their own rank, for this one match. Select a name to see their full comparison.
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | ADR | Rating | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| team_xPiekarOFF11 | ||||||||
| _ROMEO_0–Steam profile of _ROMEO_0 (opens in a new tab) | 27 | 16 | 6 | +11 | 124 | 1.53 | ||
| VIP-DevilLevel 1Steam profile of VIP-Devil (opens in a new tab) | 23 | 17 | 2 | +6 | 97, better than 99% at Level 1 | 1.23, better than 99% at Level 1 | ||
| sntWLevel 1Steam profile of sntW (opens in a new tab) | 18 | 18 | 7 | 0 | 86, better than 96% at Level 1 | 1.07, better than 95% at Level 1 | ||
| 14 | 20 | 5 | -6 | 71, better than 44% at Level 2 | 0.72, better than 19% at Level 2 | |||
| 0 | 3 | 0 | -3 | 1 | 0.72 | |||
| team_culgate13 | ||||||||
| 32 | 17 | 7 | +15 | 140, better than 99% at Level 2 | 1.84, better than 99% at Level 2 | |||
| 22 | 17 | 4 | +5 | 83, better than 93% at Level 1 | 1.44, better than 99% at Level 1 | |||
| Player | Util dmg | Flashed | Thrown |
|---|---|---|---|
| team_xPiekarOFF11 | |||
| _ROMEO_0–Steam profile of _ROMEO_0 (opens in a new tab) | 105 | 4 | 4 |
| VIP-DevilLevel 1Steam profile of VIP-Devil (opens in a new tab) | 83, better than 70% at Level 1 | 2, better than 42% at Level 1 | 2 |
| sntWLevel 1Steam | |||
FACEIT's API only has match totals, so there's no round-by-round timeline or aim stats for FACEIT matches.
| 19 |
| 18 |
| 5 |
| +1 |
| 85, better than 90% at Level 3 |
| 1.11, better than 93% at Level 3 |
| 8 | 18 | 5 | -10 | 48, better than 6% at Level 1 | 0.51, better than 6% at Level 1 |
| 10 | 21 | 9 | -11 | 57, better than 20% at Level 1 | 0.50, better than 5% at Level 1 |
| 16, better than 35% at Level 1 |
| 19, better than 99% at Level 1 |
| 20 |
| 70, better than 58% at Level 2 | 6, better than 68% at Level 2 | 7 |
| 0 | 0 | 0 |
| team_culgate13 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| 166, better than 93% at Level 2 | 6, better than 68% at Level 2 | 10 | |
| 77, better than 67% at Level 1 | 2, better than 42% at Level 1 | 2 | |
| 70, better than 54% at Level 3 | 11, better than 92% at Level 3 | 15 | |
| 81, better than 69% at Level 1 | 8, better than 81% at Level 1 | 5 | |
| 14, better than 34% at Level 1 | 7, better than 76% at Level 1 | 6 | |