Loading match
Loading match
Triangles compare each player with the typical player at their own rank, for this one match. Select a name to see their full comparison.
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | ADR | Rating | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| team_Besko__4 | ||||||||
| AmatCss–Steam profile of AmatCss (opens in a new tab) | 12 | 15 | 3 | -3 | 60 | 0.86 | ||
| Besko__Level 2Steam profile of Besko__ (opens in a new tab) | 10 | 15 | 4 | -5 | 68, better than 34% at Level 2 | 0.69, better than 16% at Level 2 | ||
| TorvynCS2–Steam profile of TorvynCS2 (opens in a new tab) | 10 | 16 | 2 | -6 | 57 | 0.64 | ||
| 7 | 16 | 2 | -9 | 52 | 0.60 | |||
| frbezar–Steam profile of frbezar (opens in a new tab) | 5 | 15 | 4 | -10 | 50 | 0.34 | ||
| team_KaBaN4iK232413 | ||||||||
| sbehatLevel 3Steam profile of sbehat (opens in a new tab) | 23 | 9 | 5 | +14 | 128, better than 99% at Level 3 | 2.03, better than 99% at Level 3 | ||
| 13 | 5 | 4 | +8 | 77, better than 57% at Level 4 | 1.35, better than 99% at Level 4 | |||
| Player | Util dmg | Flashed | Thrown |
|---|---|---|---|
| team_Besko__4 | |||
| AmatCss–Steam profile of AmatCss (opens in a new tab) | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| Besko__Level 2Steam profile of Besko__ (opens in a new tab) | 174, better than 99% at Level 2 | 5, better than 72% at Level 2 | 6 |
| TorvynCS2–Steam | |||
FACEIT's API only has match totals, so there's no round-by-round timeline or aim stats for FACEIT matches.
| 14 |
| 9 |
| 3 |
| +5 |
| 90, better than 97% at Level 2 |
| 1.24, better than 99% at Level 2 |
| 11 | 10 | 3 | +1 | 79, better than 63% at Level 4 | 0.98, better than 61% at Level 4 |
| 10 | 11 | 5 | -1 | 74, better than 23% at Level 5 | 0.78, better than 5% at Level 5 |
| 0 |
| 2 |
| 4 |
| 118 | 4 | 8 |
| frbezar–Steam profile of frbezar (opens in a new tab) | 58 | 0 | 1 |
|---|
| team_KaBaN4iK232413 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| sbehatLevel 3Steam profile of sbehat (opens in a new tab) | 103, better than 87% at Level 3 | 2, better than 48% at Level 3 | 5 |
| 16, better than 30% at Level 4 | 0, better than 1% at Level 4 | 2 | |
| 4, better than 25% at Level 2 | 2, better than 45% at Level 2 | 9 | |
| 40, better than 47% at Level 4 | 3, better than 48% at Level 4 | 7 | |
| 61, better than 54% at Level 5 | 2, better than 32% at Level 5 | 10 | |