Mirage 12–16 on CSCompare

Mirage 12–16 | CSCompare

Scoreboard

Triangles compare each player with the typical player at their own rank, for this one match. Select a name to see their full comparison.

Scoreboard: kills, deaths, damage and rating
Player	K	D	A	+/-	ADR	HS%	Multi-kills	Rating
team_baFDa1g12
TumPaFackerLevel 2Steam profile of TumPaFacker (opens in a new tab)	19	19	7	0	68, better than 33% at Level 2	42%	3×2K 2×3K	1.02, better than 87% at Level 2
baFDa1gLevel 2Steam profile of baFDa1g (opens in a new tab)	22	22	9	0	98, better than 99% at Level 2	41%	5×2K 1×3K	1.00, better than 83% at Level 2
ZlouKuznecLevel 2Steam profile of ZlouKuznec (opens in a new tab)	20	20	5	0	82, better than 93% at Level 2	35%	5×2K	0.93, better than 70% at Level 2
sln9leLevel 2Steam profile of sln9le (opens in a new tab)	20	22	6	-2	66, better than 25% at Level 2	25%	4×2K	0.85, better than 50% at Level 2
BIVL_01Level 2Steam profile of BIVL_01 (opens in a new tab)	17	24	6	-7	76, better than 71% at Level 2	59%	2×2K 1×3K	0.73, better than 20% at Level 2
team_Thornbrae16
vovchik24Level 2Steam profile of vovchik24 (opens in a new tab)	29	18	6	+11	110, better than 99% at Level 2	21%	7×2K 2×3K 1×4K	1.55, better than 99% at Level 2
ThornbraeLevel 2Steam profile of Thornbrae (opens in a new tab)	23	18	2	+5	80, better than 85% at Level 2	26%	4×2K 2×3K	1.19, better than 98% at Level 2

Utility stats for every player
Player	Util dmg	Flashed	Thrown
team_baFDa1g12
TumPaFackerLevel 2Steam profile of TumPaFacker (opens in a new tab)	0, better than 1% at Level 2	4, better than 50% at Level 2	13
baFDa1gLevel 2Steam profile of baFDa1g (opens in a new tab)	21, better than 31% at Level 2	12, better than 89% at Level 2

FACEIT's API only has match totals, so there's no round-by-round timeline or aim stats for FACEIT matches.

DablSta5Level 2Steam profile of DablSta5 (opens in a new tab)	17	18	11	-1	78, better than 78% at Level 2	29%	6×2K	0.92, better than 68% at Level 2

Panda2003RLevel 2Steam profile of Panda2003R (opens in a new tab)	13	24	9	-11	71, better than 42% at Level 2	38%	3×2K	0.57, better than 4% at Level 2

ZlouKuznecLevel 2Steam profile of ZlouKuznec (opens in a new tab)	110, better than 70% at Level 2	3, better than 44% at Level 2	3

sln9leLevel 2Steam profile of sln9le (opens in a new tab)	109, better than 69% at Level 2	4, better than 50% at Level 2	9

BIVL_01Level 2Steam profile of BIVL_01 (opens in a new tab)	24, better than 32% at Level 2	3, better than 44% at Level 2	5

team_Thornbrae16
vovchik24Level 2Steam profile of vovchik24 (opens in a new tab)	98, better than 65% at Level 2	10, better than 82% at Level 2	16
ThornbraeLevel 2Steam profile of Thornbrae (opens in a new tab)	14, better than 28% at Level 2	17, better than 97% at Level 2	17
ddag1Level 2Steam profile of ddag1 (opens in a new tab)	68, better than 51% at Level 2	8, better than 73% at Level 2	10
DablSta5Level 2Steam profile of DablSta5 (opens in a new tab)	329, better than 99% at Level 2	4, better than 50% at Level 2	10
Panda2003RLevel 2Steam profile of Panda2003R (opens in a new tab)	98, better than 65% at Level 2	0, better than 1% at Level 2	0