Loading match
Loading match
Triangles compare each player with the typical player at their own rank, for this one match. Select a name to see their full comparison.
| Player | K | D | A | +/- | ADR | Rating | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| team_tofik_ww10 | ||||||||
| sayudda–Steam profile of sayudda (opens in a new tab) | 27 | 17 | 5 | +10 | 125 | 1.55 | ||
| 16 | 17 | 4 | -1 | 68, better than 44% at Level 2 | 0.92, better than 70% at Level 2 | |||
| 13 | 16 | 10 | -3 | 73, better than 63% at Level 2 | 0.90, better than 66% at Level 2 | |||
| VankrazLevel 2Steam profile of Vankraz (opens in a new tab) | 14 | 19 | 5 | -5 | 77, better than 76% at Level 2 | 0.70, better than 17% at Level 2 | ||
| 11 | 20 | 4 | -9 | 45, better than 3% at Level 2 | 0.58, better than 6% at Level 2 | |||
| team_Pakoslaw13 | ||||||||
| olcia2009Level 2Steam profile of olcia2009 (opens in a new tab) | 29 | 14 | 4 | +15 | 122, better than 99% at Level 2 | 1.98, better than 99% at Level 2 | ||
| 23 | 16 | 5 | +7 | 94, better than 99% at Level 2 | 1.41, better than 99% at Level 2 | |||
| Player | Util dmg | Flashed | Thrown |
|---|---|---|---|
| team_tofik_ww10 | |||
| sayudda–Steam profile of sayudda (opens in a new tab) | 85 | 1 | 7 |
| 22, better than 33% at Level 2 | 0, better than 1% at Level 2 | 0 | |
FACEIT's API only has match totals, so there's no round-by-round timeline or aim stats for FACEIT matches.
| 14 |
| 17 |
| 3 |
| -3 |
| 71, better than 57% at Level 2 |
| 0.85, better than 50% at Level 2 |
| 14 | 19 | 7 | -5 | 84, better than 90% at Level 2 | 0.80, better than 41% at Level 2 |
| 6 | 17 | 3 | -11 | 43 | 0.43 |
| 232, better than 99% at Level 2 |
| 3, better than 48% at Level 2 |
| 11 |
| VankrazLevel 2Steam profile of Vankraz (opens in a new tab) | 7, better than 26% at Level 2 | 5, better than 63% at Level 2 | 9 |
|---|
| 139, better than 88% at Level 2 | 2, better than 40% at Level 2 | 3 |
| team_Pakoslaw13 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| olcia2009Level 2Steam profile of olcia2009 (opens in a new tab) | 132, better than 86% at Level 2 | 6, better than 69% at Level 2 | 10 |
| 380, better than 99% at Level 2 | 11, better than 92% at Level 2 | 26 | |
| 0, better than 1% at Level 2 | 3, better than 48% at Level 2 | 6 | |
| 211, better than 98% at Level 2 | 8, better than 81% at Level 2 | 7 | |
| 232 | 5 | 15 | |