Nuke 13–11 on CSCompare

Nuke 13–11 | CSCompare

Scoreboard

Triangles compare each player with the typical player at their own rank, for this one match. Select a name to see their full comparison.

Scoreboard: kills, deaths, damage and rating
Player	K	D	A	+/-	ADR	HS%	Multi-kills	Rating
team_CiapatyPizda13
TrickeRRoLevel 5Steam profile of TrickeRRo (opens in a new tab)	29	15	1	+14	110, better than 99% at Level 5	52%	5×2K 4×3K	1.73, better than 99% at Level 5
CiapatyPizdaLevel 3Steam profile of CiapatyPizda (opens in a new tab)	20	16	4	+4	86, better than 95% at Level 3	45%	2×2K 2×3K	1.16, better than 97% at Level 3
AgroeN22Level 4Steam profile of AgroeN22 (opens in a new tab)	17	18	8	-1	90, better than 92% at Level 4	41%	2×2K 1×4K	0.99, better than 60% at Level 4
TOXIKKK2Level 5Steam profile of TOXIKKK2 (opens in a new tab)	14	16	9	-2	62, better than 4% at Level 5	43%	3×2K	0.83, better than 12% at Level 5
zSkrabyLevel 5Steam profile of zSkraby (opens in a new tab)	14	20	7	-6	80, better than 50% at Level 5	29%	2×2K	0.67, better than 2% at Level 5
team_NNishel411
imiczlolLevel 5Steam profile of imiczlol (opens in a new tab)	20	20	3	0	87, better than 78% at Level 5	30%	2×2K 2×3K 1×4K	1.17, better than 89% at Level 5
67eryczeqLevel 4Steam profile of 67eryczeq (opens in a new tab)	18	14	4	+4	75, better than 39% at Level 4	33%	4×2K 1×3K	1.14, better than 90% at Level 4

Utility stats for every player
Player	Util dmg	Flashed	Thrown
team_CiapatyPizda13
TrickeRRoLevel 5Steam profile of TrickeRRo (opens in a new tab)	24, better than 29% at Level 5	4, better than 48% at Level 5	3
CiapatyPizdaLevel 3Steam profile of CiapatyPizda (opens in a new tab)	51, better than 49% at Level 3	0, better than 1% at Level 3

FACEIT's API only has match totals, so there's no round-by-round timeline or aim stats for FACEIT matches.

One match swings a lot, so treat this as a snapshot.

Xanterespeec was unranked in this match, so there's no rank to compare with.

NNishel4Level 5Steam profile of NNishel4 (opens in a new tab)	17	23	8	-6	94, better than 94% at Level 5	53%	3×2K 1×3K	0.77, better than 5% at Level 5

Xanterespeec–Steam profile of Xanterespeec (opens in a new tab)	10	21	3	-11	48	80%	1×2K	0.47

AgroeN22Level 4Steam profile of AgroeN22 (opens in a new tab)	12, better than 27% at Level 4	5, better than 56% at Level 4	6

TOXIKKK2Level 5Steam profile of TOXIKKK2 (opens in a new tab)	126, better than 84% at Level 5	9, better than 82% at Level 5	10

zSkrabyLevel 5Steam profile of zSkraby (opens in a new tab)	0, better than 1% at Level 5	0, better than 1% at Level 5	0

team_NNishel411
imiczlolLevel 5Steam profile of imiczlol (opens in a new tab)	107, better than 76% at Level 5	12, better than 93% at Level 5	11
67eryczeqLevel 4Steam profile of 67eryczeq (opens in a new tab)	0, better than 1% at Level 4	1, better than 27% at Level 4	6
EchoThunderLevel 4Steam profile of EchoThunder (opens in a new tab)	67, better than 59% at Level 4	5, better than 56% at Level 4	10
NNishel4Level 5Steam profile of NNishel4 (opens in a new tab)	4, better than 18% at Level 5	0, better than 1% at Level 5	0
Xanterespeec–Steam profile of Xanterespeec (opens in a new tab)	59	3	8